MathGroup Archive 1998

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: Random[Real]: How good is it? Is it better/worse than Park-Miller, etc?


> Hi,
>   
> How good is the RNG in Mathematica, Random[Real]?
> 
> -- Oscar Stiffelman
> Stanford University Computer Science, Masters Program
> ozzie at cs.stanford.edu

See 

http://www.wolfram.com/support/Kernel/Symbols/System/Random.html

in the Wolfram Research web site, which gives a reference for the
algorithm used by Random[Real]:

        George Marsaglia and Arif Zaman, A New Class of Random Number
        Generators, The Annals of Applied Probability, 1991, Vol. 1,
        No. 3, p462-480.

This reference describes how good the random numbers will be.  The
period is about 10^445.

Dave Withoff
Wolfram Research


  • Prev by Date: How to see a scanned photo whith Mathematica
  • Next by Date: Derivatives D[ ] as Functions inside Tables; Need Help!
  • Previous by thread: Re: How to see a scanned photo whith Mathematica
  • Next by thread: Re: Random[Real]: How good is it? Is it better/worse than Park-Miller, etc?