MathGroup Archive 2004

[Date Index] [Thread Index] [Author Index]

Search the Archive

Re: 3D plotting problem

  • To: mathgroup at
  • Subject: [mg51755] Re: 3D plotting problem
  • From: "Steve Luttrell" <steve_usenet at>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 02:52:31 -0500 (EST)
  • References: <cm20mr$g60$>
  • Sender: owner-wri-mathgroup at

This is the sort of thing you want to do:





    1. Your notation for the 2p orbital function (the left hand side of your 
definition) could not possibly have worked in Mathematica so I have 
rewritten it.
    2. The surface in ContourPlot3D is defined as Abs[fz[x,y,z,1]]-0.3 == 0. 
I have used Abs so you get both of the lobes of the 2p orbital in the same 
    3. PlotPoints->{7,7}] gives you sufficient resolution for a good quality 
plot. If the resolution is set too low then the plot might not appear at 
    4. Play around with the various parameters to get whatever plot you 
actually want.

Steve Luttrell

"Henning Heiberg-Andersen" <Henning.Heiberg-Andersen at> wrote in 
message news:cm20mr$g60$1 at
> Hi,
> I find myself unable to make a 3D plot of the atomic
> 2p orbital
> f_z(2p,x,y,z;a)=z*Exp[-a*Sqrt[x^2+y^2+z^2]].
> As far as I can understand, 'ContourPlot3D' is the
> only option, but it gives either an empty plot box or
> a flat sheet.
> Can anyone suggest a way out?
> Best regards,
> Henning Heiberg-Andersen

  • Prev by Date: Re: Converting Mathematica to MS Word
  • Next by Date: Re: plot variance(s)
  • Previous by thread: Re: 3D plotting problem
  • Next by thread: Re: Re: 3D plotting problem